Nothing riles a car owner more than an
insurer’s decision to repair an accident-damaged vehicle with aftermarket
rather than original equipment manufacturer (OEM) parts, but the practice is
commonplace and, subject to circumstances, considered acceptable by both the
South African Insurance Association and the Ombudsman for Short-term Insurance
(Osti).
An OEM part is a component that is
manufactured for or on behalf of the manufacturer and fitted to the vehicle on
the production line.
Aftermarket parts are generic versions
of manufacturer-approved parts. “They may carry a Certified Aftermarket Part
(CAP) certification, which is proof that the item will fit, perform and last
like the OEM equivalent,” says Malcolm Rajah, general manager of motor
procurement at Hollard Insure.
The Osti receives countless complaints
from policyholders who are unhappy with the use of aftermarket parts, which
they feel compromise their car’s performance or safety.
“Our approach to the OEM versus
aftermarket part debate has been consistent over time,” says Peter Nkhuna,
senior assistant ombudsman at the Osti. “We hold that the replacement of
damaged parts with aftermarket parts can be undertaken where this is feasible
and does not result in the consumer being prejudiced.”
Prejudice arises from the compromise of
service and maintenance plans or warranties as well as safety considerations.
Nkhuna notes that whether or not the use of aftermarket parts results in
prejudice must be judged on the merits of each dispute.
South Africa’s insurers have slightly
different views on replacement parts, but are reasonably aligned on the
overarching principles. They can, and often do, elect to use aftermarket parts
when repairing vehicles that are outside of a manufacturer’s warranty.
“It is international best practice to
fit CAPs during repairs on motor vehicles outside of warranty or motor plan;
our focus is on quality and meeting safety standards [with due consideration
for] the cost benefits to both the policyholder and insurer,” said Gerhard
Genis, head of quality management at Santam. He says CAP parts cost a fraction
of their OEM equivalents and that the use of these parts often means the
difference between repairing a vehicle and writing it off.
“An insurer has a legal obligation to
indemnify you and to be reasonable in doing so; what is reasonable will depend
on the specific circumstances of each claim,” says Nkhuna.
Genis says the central premise of
insurance is to put the policyholder back into a similar position as before the
loss or damage. But he says insurers are inconsistent in describing their
replacement parts practices in their policy wordings. “Most local motor
policies are silent regarding what type of spare parts should be used in a repair,
and it is not usually addressed in the contract between insurers and
policyholders,” he says. Santam’s policies are underwritten on a like-for-like
basis, which gives the insurer the right to use alternative parts as long as
these do not compromise the quality or safety of the repair.
Rajah says Hollard’s practice is to
ensure that the vehicle claims assessor discusses the use of CAPs with the
policyholder. You should, therefore, keep a close eye on the quote and
interrogate your insurer or panel beater on the parts approved for use in the
repair. An insurer should seek your consent before instructing a vehicle
repairer to use aftermarket parts, Rajah says.
Nkhuna says the law is the final
arbiter in replacement parts disputes: “Regardless of the provisions contained
in an insurer’s policy, an insurer still has a legal obligation to be
reasonable in its approach. The party that can substantiate its case will be
the one that ultimately prevails.” This means you cannot insist on an
unreasonable repair where an equally effective but less costly repair is
possible. Likewise, you cannot insist on a replacement where a repair would be
adequate. “The approach of keeping costs down is generally good for the
collective of insurance consumers, even though it may compromise individuals in
specific circumstances,” Nkhuna says.
Consumers also raise concerns that
vehicle manufacturers might sidestep their ongoing liability if aftermarket
parts are used in a repair. “Once a vehicle’s warranty has expired, the
manufacturer, unless undertaking a specific parts recall campaign, carries no
liability should a part failure occur,” says Rajah. “Where CAPs are sourced and
fitted on vehicles that are out of their manufacturer warranty period, the
parts supplier holds the guarantee.”
In 2009 the Osti issued a statement
saying that “original factory-supplied components must be fitted whenever a
critical component of the motor vehicle is damaged or where the warranty or
maintenance plan of a vehicle may be adversely affected by the fitment of other
components”. This position holds to this day, though it does not describe all
circumstances in which OEM components should be fitted.
Article
written by Gareth Stokes, who is a freelance financial writer specialising in
insurance.
Featured in Insurance On Line
images by - Pixabay